← all case files
verified deployment saas · US · cross

After backlash, Zoom reversed its terms of service so it will not use customer content to train AI (August 2023)

In March 2023 Zoom changed its online terms of service (effective 27 July 2023); section 10.4 let Zoom use 'Service Generated Data' 'for any purpose ... including for the purpose of ... machine learning or artificial intelligence (including for the purposes of training and tuning of algorithms and models),' with no opt-out. After the clause surfaced on 6–7 August 2023, a public backlash spread. Zoom updated section 10.4 / section 10 and, in a blog post by CPO Smita Hashim (edited 11 August 2023), said it 'does not use any of your audio, video, chat, screen sharing, attachments, or other communications like customer content ... to train Zoom's or third-party artificial intelligence models.' This is a Terms-of-Service AI walk-back, carried by Zoom's own blog plus two independent newsrooms.

published 2026-08-09 verified on 2026-09-27 client named 5 sources

The problem

In March 2023 Zoom updated its online terms of service, with the change taking effect 27 July 2023. Section 10.4 granted Zoom broad rights over “Service Generated Data for any purpose,” and, as [source] quoted the terms directly, the permitted purposes included “machine learning or artificial intelligence (including for the purposes of training and tuning of algorithms and models)” [source]. There was no opt-out. A second, independent newsroom quoted a different part of the same clause: [source] reported that “In Section 10.4 of Zoom“‘s terms, “updated in March,” users granted Zoom a licence for purposes including “machine learning, artificial intelligence, training, testing” [source]. On 6–7 August 2023 the clause was surfaced publicly and a backlash spread among users, educators and privacy advocates who read it as permission to feed calls, chats and other communications into AI training. Zoom’s own blog later confirmed the origin firsthand: “We changed our online terms of service in March 2023” [source].

What happened

After the backlash, Zoom reversed course and updated its terms. In its first-party [source] (attributed to Chief Product Officer Smita Hashim, “edited on August 11, 2023”), the company said it “does not use any of your audio, video, chat, screen sharing, attachments, or other communications like customer content … to train Zoom’s or third-party artificial intelligence models,” and that it had moved to “reorganize Section 10” of the terms [source]. [source] reported the company had updated the terms so that “we will not use audio, video, or chat Customer Content to train our artificial intelligence models without customer consent” [source]. [source] independently reported the broadened statement, that Zoom “does not use any of your audio, video, chat, screen-sharing, attachments, or other communications like customer content” to train AI, noting the change to “the previously troublesome section 10 in” Zoom’s terms of service [source].

The distinctive fact

The reversal carried a consent caveat rather than a blanket prohibition. As [source] reported the clarification, Zoom said that “for AI, we do not use audio, video or chat content for training our models without customer consent”, and users who switch on Zoom’s generative-AI features (Meeting Summary, Team Chat Compose) consent to Zoom training on their content [source]. The walk-back removed the automatic, no-opt-out AI-training grant over communications; it did not remove AI training entirely.

The single soft spot is that the original, pre-walk-back section 10.4 text is quoted here through independent press (CNBC and NBC News), not from an archived first-party copy of Zoom’s old terms page. CNBC and NBC News are strong independent secondaries (Tier 2), and they quote the clause verbatim and agree on its substance, but the canonical original terms document itself is not in hand. Zoom’s own blog confirms first-party only that the terms changed in March 2023, not the exact wording of the disputed clause. Two independent newsrooms quoting the clause verbatim and agreeing on its substance is what the public-record standard rests on, and that standard is met here. An archived first-party copy of Zoom’s pre-walk-back section 10.4 would strengthen the record further; it is not in hand, and this page does not claim it.

How this was verified

  • Method: AI Terms-of-Service walk-back record. Both critical claims, the original AI/ML-training grant (c1) and the post-backlash reversal (c2), rest on two independent newsrooms each, plus Zoom’s own first-party blog as the origin. Every load-bearing fragment was re-checked verbatim against the specific capture it is attributed to (12/12 bind, 0 misses), this session.
  • Byte-tie: all five on-disk captures are Wayback id_ raw payloads whose local sha1-b32 equals the live Wayback CDX digest (status 200): Zoom blog 20230812065407, CNBC 20230807175926, NBC News 20230808022407, TechCrunch 20230809013803, Engadget 20230811184916.
  • Date checked: 2026-08-09 (graduation); presentation re-verified 2026-08-18; sources re-verified live 2026-09-21. The reversal held verbatim on Zoom’s own blog (since re-edited, note dated 2024-02-07), TechCrunch and Engadget; the original section-10.4 grant held verbatim on NBC News. CNBC returned 403 to an automated fetch this session, but both facts attributed to it (the “Service Generated Data” AI/ML clause and the “without customer consent” caveat) are independently corroborated by NBC News and TechCrunch respectively, and CNBC stays byte-tied to its Wayback capture.
  • Standard: independently validated against the public record. Both critical claims are corroborated by multiple independent sources plus Zoom’s own first-party blog. Green does not depend on Zoom confirming anything. The one residual limit, the original clause quoted through independent press rather than an archived first-party terms page, is noted above.

Sources

  1. 01
    Zoom blog · “How Zoom’s terms of service and practices apply to AI” (Smita Hashim, Chief Product Officer) · edited 2023-08-11 · Tier 1 (first-party origin) · https://blog.zoom.us/zooms-term-service-ai/
  2. 02
    CNBC · “Zoom AI tools trained using some customer data, updated terms say” · 2023-08-07 · Tier 2 (independent secondary) · https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/07/zoom-ai-tools-trained-using-some-customer-data.html
  3. 03
    NBC News · “Zoom responds to privacy concerns raised by AI data collection” · 2023-08-07 · Tier 2 (independent secondary) · https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/zoom-ai-privacy-tos-terms-of-service-data-rcna98665
  4. 04
    TechCrunch · “Zoom knots itself a legal tangle over use of customer data for training AI models” (Natasha Lomas) · 2023-08-08 · Tier 2 (independent secondary) · https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/08/zoom-data-mining-for-ai-terms-gdpr-eprivacy/
  5. 05
    Engadget · “Zoom now says it won’t use any customer content for AI training” (Will Shanklin) · 2023-08-11 · Tier 2 (independent secondary) · https://www.engadget.com/zoom-now-says-it-wont-use-any-customer-content-for-ai-training-170533411.html

Terms of service, section 10.4 (Service Generated Data; machine learning / AI)Zoom IQ generative-AI features (Meeting Summary, Team Chat Compose)

Verification record

Status
verified
Method
AI Terms-of-Service walk-back record. The reversal is documented first-party in Zoom's own blog post (CPO Smita Hashim, published 7 Aug 2023, edited 11 Aug 2023) and independently by TechCrunch (2023-08-08) and Engadget (2023-08-11); the original disputed section-10.4 clause is quoted verbatim by CNBC (2023-08-07) and NBC News (2023-08-07), and its existence is confirmed first-party by Zoom's blog. All five captures are byte-tied (local sha1-b32 == Wayback CDX digest) and every quoted fragment was grep -F byte-verified against the specific capture it is attributed to. Both critical claims are corroborated against the independent public record: the original grant by two newsrooms quoting section 10.4 verbatim plus Zoom's own first-party confirmation that the terms changed, and the reversal by Zoom's blog plus two independent newsrooms.
Verified on
2026-09-27
Provider
Zoom Video Communications
Client
Zoom Video Communications · Video conferencing / communications SaaS; AI terms of service
Disclosure
named

Questions this file answers

Does Zoom use customer content to train AI?

After the August 2023 backlash, Zoom updated its terms of service and said it does not use audio, video, chat, screen sharing or attachments to train its or third-party AI models without customer consent.

What did section 10.4 of Zoom's terms of service say?

As quoted by CNBC and NBC News, the terms changed in March 2023 let Zoom use Service Generated Data for machine learning and artificial intelligence, including training and tuning of models, with no opt-out.

Did Zoom remove AI training entirely?

No. The walk-back removed the automatic, no-opt-out grant over communications, but users who switch on Zoom's generative-AI features consent to Zoom training on their content.

More case files like this

verified Kadrey v. Meta: a court called LLM training on pirated books fair use, but only because the authors failed to prove market dilution legal · US · cross verified A Florida federal judge refused to call Character.AI's chatbot output 'speech' and let a wrongful-death product-liability suit proceed software · US · cross verified Nature Medicine (2026): general-purpose LLMs outperform two deployed specialized clinical AI tools on medical benchmarks healthcare · US · cross