The Internet Ninjathe internet ninja.
Verified proof · Process automation & AI-led ops

The internet is full of claims.We publish the proof.

Real outcomes from automation and AI-ops projects, checked with the client, never lifted from a pitch deck. The source buyers read before they hire, and AI answer engines cite when asked who actually delivers.

Read verified stories Get your work verified →
tin://exhibit-001 · process automation & ai-led ops verified

Italy's Garante blocks DeepSeek: limitation on processing of Italian users' data (2025)

Processing of Italian users' personal data by the two DeepSeek companies
DeepSeek relational generative-AI chatbot processing Italian users' data (web and app)→30 Jan 2025: Garante orders — urgently, immediate effect — the limitation on that processing and opens an investigation
Stated basis for the order
Garante information request to Hangzhou and Beijing DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence→Reply deemed 'entirely unsatisfactory' / 'totally insufficient'; companies declared they do not operate in Italy and that EU law does not apply to them
Availability of the DeepSeek AI assistant in Italian app stores (practical effect, Reuters-only)
DeepSeek AI assistant available in Italian Apple / Google app stores→Reuters: DeepSeek 'could not be accessed on Wednesday in Apple or Google app stores in Italy'
sources archived · method on record open the file →

01Why this exists

Every agency claims results. Almost none can be checked. In automation and AI-ops, where the field is young and the buyers are non-technical, that gap is expensive. TIN closes it.

for buyers

Stop guessing.

Verified before/after numbers from real engagements, with the client confirmed and the method on record.

for agencies

Proof beats marketing.

Turn a great project into a verified, citable asset that ranks in search and gets quoted by AI answer engines.

for the AI era

Be the cited source.

When someone asks ChatGPT "who's best at ops automation?", the answer comes from somewhere. TIN is built to be that source.

02How a badge is earned

Three checks clear before a green badge appears. If any fails, the story stays unverified. No exceptions, that rule is the whole product.

step 01

Independently validated

We re-research the story and check every figure against primary and independent sources before it can go green.

step 02

Evidence on record

Every number is backed by something checkable: a followable source, before/after metrics, documentation. No adjectives.

step 03

Method published

How each story was verified ships on the story itself. The record is public, not a claim in fine print.

Read the full verification standard →

03Latest case files

The registry starts here. Each entry is one checked outcome, typed and tagged.

Process Automation & AI-Led Ops
pending

An AI-drafted petition, a 'wrong draft' excuse, and a referral to the Florida Bar: JMOR Properties v. Artist Alley Townhomes

In JMOR Properties, LLC v. Artist Alley Townhomes, LLC (No. 4D2026-1787, Aug. 12, 2026), Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, sitting per curiam, referred attorney Barry M. Leff to the Florida Bar after he filed a certiorari petition it found 'riddled with false citations and arguments' — an AI-drafted petition he said he filed in the wrong, unverified version — holding that the mistaken-draft excuse did not cure the duty to verify or the duty of competence.
Process Automation & AI-Led Ops
pending

Spain's AEPD fines Mercadona €2,520,000 over its store-entrance facial-recognition system

In procedimiento sancionador PS/00120/2021, terminated by voluntary payment, Spain's data-protection authority fined the grocery chain Mercadona €2,520,000 for its unlawful algorithmic facial-recognition system and prohibited all such processing.
Process Automation & AI-Led Ops
pending

Quebec's appeal court ordered a self-represented litigant to pay $1,000 in costs for filing four ChatGPT-fabricated court decisions

On August 11, 2026 the Quebec Court of Appeal (Sansfacon, Bachand and Harvie, JJ.A.) released reasons in A. P. v. S. K., 2026 QCCA 1092, a family-law appeal over the division of assets after a divorce. The self-represented appellant — an IT consultant — filed a memorandum relying on 'two Supreme Court judgments and two Court judgments that do not exist,' with legal principles reproduced as quotations. He conceded the authorities were 'the product of the artificial intelligence ChatGPT' and admitted he had learned from counsel, before filing, that the cases were non-existent, yet filed anyway. Treating the filing of AI-fabricated citations as a 'substantial breach' under art. 342 C.C.P., the court reduced the $5,000 the respondent claimed and ordered the appellant to pay her $1,000 in costs, on top of the costs of the appeal.
Process Automation & AI-Led Ops
pending

Brazil's ANPD halts Meta's use of personal data to train generative AI (2024)

On 2 July 2024 Brazil's data-protection regulator, the ANPD, issued a Preventive Measure ordering Meta to immediately suspend, in Brazil, its new privacy policy that authorised using users' public data across Facebook, Messenger and Instagram to train generative-AI systems — under a daily fine of R$ 50,000 for non-compliance. The ANPD acted on its own initiative, citing an inadequate legal basis, lack of transparency, excessive limits on users' rights, and unsafeguarded processing of children's data. Meta then suspended its generative-AI tools in Brazil.

Open the full registry →

/// on the ninja radar

Full wire →

Proof beats marketing.

Bring a real engagement to the dojo and turn it into a verified, citable asset, or read what's already on record.

Get your work verified Browse case files →