# SEC AI-washing order: Presto's drive-thru 'voice AI' needed a human on every order > On 14 January 2025 the SEC entered a settled cease-and-desist order against Presto Automation, finding its drive-thru AI claims materially false: the original version of Presto's own voice AI 'required human agent intervention, including entering the order, in all instances' — off-site agents in the Philippines and India — while filings claimed it 'eliminat[es] human order taking' and reported 95%–99% automation rates that counted only restaurant-staff involvement. Even the advanced 2023 pilot needed a human on roughly 70% of orders. - Verification status: verified - Case type: deployment - Provider: Presto Automation Inc. (marketed its own drive-thru voice AI, Presto Voice) - Client: Presto Automation Inc., Restaurant technology — drive-thru voice-AI order taking for quick-service restaurants (named) - Sector: restaurant technology / United States / finance - Verified on: 2026-08-02 - Canonical URL: https://theinternetninja.com/stories/sec-ai-washing-presto-automation-voice-ai-drive-thru-human-agents-cease-and-desist-2025/ - Source: The Internet Ninja (theinternetninja.com), independent verified-proof platform ## Outcomes | Metric | Before | After | | --- | --- | --- | | Actual human-in-the-loop rate (SEC finding) | | | | What was claimed | | | | Technology-ownership finding | | | | Sanction | | | ## Verification method Signed SEC order (Securities Act Rel. 11352, File No. 3-22413) sourced from its publication-week Wayback capture whose CDX SHA-1 digest matches the stored file exactly and is unchanged across nine captures Jan–Apr 2025 (live sec.gov rate-limited this session); SEC AP-summary page captured; quote-verified end to end; two independent relays carry the order's key findings firsthand — D&O Diary (Kevin LaCroix) and Cooley PubCo (Cydney Posner, byte-tied Wayback capture 20250209) — plus The Verge (Mia Sato) on the pre-order disclosure ## Full case file ## The problem "Voice AI for the drive-thru" was one of the flagship automation pitches of the 2021–2023 wave, and Presto Automation sold it harder than most: a September 2022 SPAC listing, filings claiming its Presto Voice product "eliminat[es] human order taking," and investor decks reporting "automated order completion" rates of 95% to 99%. On 14 January 2025 the SEC entered a settled cease-and-desist order finding those statements materially false and misleading. This is a verified negative: an independent federal regulator, in a signed public order, measured the gap between an AI-automation pitch and the system that actually ran. ## What the SEC found Three layers, all from the order (Presto consented without admitting or denying the findings): **The "AI" was humans — in all instances.** The original version of Presto's own proprietary voice AI, commercially deployed from September 2022, "required human agent intervention, including entering the order, in all instances." The system converted the customer's voice to text, displayed it to human agents Presto contracted "at various off-site locations, including in the Philippines and India," and those agents entered the order. The order is explicit that this was by design: the technology "was designed to rely on this human support and was not capable of processing orders without it." Even the more advanced version piloted from June 2023 "required a human agent to enter the orders approximately 70% of the time" through at least December 2023. ## The automation metrics measured the wrong humans Presto reported "automated order completion" and "non-intervention" rates of 95%–99%. Per the order, those rates counted only orders completed without *restaurant staff* involvement — the off-site human agents entering the orders were invisible in the metric. Presto's own executives flagged the problem internally: the order quotes one raising concerns in January 2023 that the company was "telling investors Presto AI is running 95%+ accuracy without disclosing AI is doing NONE of the work and all orders are processed by humans." ## For its first year, the AI wasn't Presto's From at least November 2021 to September 2022, every commercially deployed Presto Voice unit ran voice AI "owned and operated by Supplier A" — a third party — while Presto's filings called Presto Voice "our technology." The order itself identifies the partner via Presto's January 2022 press release, which mentioned "developing the solution in partnership with Hi Auto" exactly once. ## The unraveling The truth surfaced only after the SEC began investigating. In an October 2023 Form 10-K, Presto first disclosed the off-site human agents who "enter, review, validate and correct orders received by Presto Voice." A November 17, 2023 prospectus supplement disclosed that "over 70% of orders taken by our Presto Voice solution require human agent intervention" — and a December 14, 2023 8-K clarified that even that figure covered only the few advanced-pilot locations: at the substantial majority of locations, human agent intervention was required on 100% of orders, with an 85% average non-intervention rate across restaurants on Presto's proprietary technology. The Verge reported the disclosures the same week ("off-site human workers are stepping in and completing over 70 percent of orders," crediting Bloomberg). Nasdaq suspended trading in Presto's stock on August 8, 2024; the company's deregistration became effective December 18, 2024; the cease-and-desist order followed on January 14, 2025. The SEC imposed no civil penalty, citing Presto's cooperation and remedial efforts (the order adds its financial condition). ## Why this matters for buyers The order documents, with regulator-grade precision, the exact failure mode TIN's verification model exists to catch: an automation rate defined so the humans doing the work don't count. The offerings at stake were real money — a ~$55.5M PIPE and a ~$9.5M private placement raised while the statements stood. Before you buy an "automation rate," ask who is excluded from the denominator. *Verification status: checking — all critical figures originate with the SEC in a signed order; framed throughout as the Commission's findings, which Presto neither admitted nor denied.*