<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ninja radar: The Internet Ninja</title>
    <link>https://theinternetninja.com/radar/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://theinternetninja.com/radar.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>A daily sweep of AI and automation deployments, walk-backs, and corrections across marketing, ops, and finance. Every figure is quote-verified against the live source and archived before it appears.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Commonwealth Bank reverses AI voice-bot job cuts after call volumes rose</title>
      <link>https://theinternetninja.com/radar/#cba-voice-bot-walk-back</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tin-radar-cba-voice-bot-walk-back</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ops</category>
      <category>banking</category>
      <description>Commonwealth Bank of Australia cut more than 40 customer service roles and replaced them with an AI voice bot, then reversed the cuts after the system &quot;was unable to cope, which led to an increase in calls&quot; (CNBC, 2026-07-01, citing Australia's finance sector union and an ABC report). The union called the rescission &quot;a massive win.&quot; The underlying cuts date to 2025; the fresh reporting is CNBC's July 2026 retrospective on AI-layoff reversals. Single independent source in this flash; the union statement and ABC report are the primary trail for a deeper case file. Sources: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/01/employers-who-laid-off-workers-for-ai-are-reversing-their-decisions.html</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM: AI handled 94 percent of routine HR requests, and the missing 6 percent sent it back to hiring people</title>
      <link>https://theinternetninja.com/radar/#ibm-hr-ai-94-percent-rehiring</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tin-radar-ibm-hr-ai-94-percent-rehiring</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ops</category>
      <category>software</category>
      <description>IBM automated its human resources functions with AI that &quot;handled around 94% of routine requests but was unable to meet the other 6%, which included ethical dilemmas&quot; (CNBC, 2026-07-01). The company then announced plans to triple its US entry-level hiring across all business units in 2026. Its chief human resources officer, Nickle LaMoreaux, framed the rehiring as a pipeline problem: &quot;If we don't continue to invest in entry-level hires, what happens in three-five years? There's no pipeline.&quot; The 94 percent figure is company-originated and relayed by CNBC; single independent source in this flash. Sources: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/01/employers-who-laid-off-workers-for-ai-are-reversing-their-decisions.html</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Salesforce ships Help Agent with pay-per-resolution pricing, citing 4.3 million inquiries and 70 percent resolution on its own help portal</title>
      <link>https://theinternetninja.com/radar/#salesforce-agentforce-help-agent-pay-per-resolution</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tin-radar-salesforce-agentforce-help-agent-pay-per-resolution</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ops</category>
      <category>software</category>
      <description>Salesforce announced Agentforce Help Agent with pay-per-resolution pricing: customers are charged only when the agent resolves an issue, generally available July 2026. The proof point is Salesforce's own deployment: the company says Agentforce on help.salesforce.com &quot;handled 4.3 million inquiries and resolved 70 percent of them&quot; (announcement dated 2026-06-25), a figure CIO relayed as &quot;resolved 70% of them&quot; the same day. Both figures originate with Salesforce and are not independently audited; the deployer and the vendor are the same company, so read this as a vendor's self-deployment claim with an unusually concrete pricing commitment attached. The pay-per-resolution model itself is the newsier fact: it prices the product on outcomes, which invites external measurement. Sources: https://www.salesforce.com/news/stories/agentforce-help-agent-announcement/ · https://www.cio.com/article/4189183/salesforce-unveils-ai-help-agent-with-pay-per-resolution-pricing.html</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
